PHALIN THAKKAR

Why the square matters

Why does projection give cosθ while intensity gives cos²θ?

Note 1 · Explanatory note

Analytical result · Hypothetical examples are not physical measurements.

For an ideal linearly polarized monochromatic wave, write the incoming field as E0 cos(ωt). Projection onto the analyzer multiplies its amplitude by cosθ. A detector responding to average energy flow measures a quantity proportional to the time average of the squared field.

⟨Eout2⟩=E02cos⁡2θ⟨cos⁡2ωt⟩=12E02cos⁡2θ.\langle E_{\rm out}^2\rangle =E_0^2\cos^2\theta\langle\cos^2\omega t\rangle =\frac12E_0^2\cos^2\theta.

The incoming time average contains the same factor ½, so the intensity ratio is cos²θ.

At 60°, the amplitude is ½ of its original value and the intensity is ¼. At 120° the projected field has a negative amplitude factor, but the same squared intensity. An intensity detector does not recover that field sign.

Extension: angular uncertainty matters through the slope. For the normalized intensity J = cos²θ:

dJdθ=−sin⁡2θ,σJ≈∣sin⁡2θ∣σθ.\frac{dJ}{d\theta}=-\sin2\theta,\qquad \sigma_J\approx|\sin2\theta|\sigma_\theta.

Angles must be in radians in this derivative. At 30°, a small 1° standard uncertainty gives σJ ≈ 0.0151, with the reference intensity treated as known.

At alignment or extinction the first derivative vanishes. This does not make every uncertainty zero; higher order effects and other uncertainty sources remain.

Continue the reasoning

Reading the curve

All twelve notes

Back to home